Key result
A publicly available multimodal neuroimaging and physiological dataset was generated from a 5-week randomized clinical trial comparing heart rate variability biofeedback to increase versus decrease heart rate oscillations in 193 adults.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to test the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in younger and older individuals.
Does HRV biofeedback (increasing vs decreasing heart rate oscillations) affect neuroimaging, physiological, and psychological measures in adults?
RCT (n=193)
Single-blind
Blocked randomization
No
Does HRV biofeedback (increasing vs decreasing heart rate oscillations) affect neuroimaging, physiological, and psychological measures in adults?
This paper provides a publicly available multimodal dataset to study the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback on neuroimaging and physiological parameters.
Enables secondary analyses of HRV biofeedback effects; extends open multimodal RCT resources for cardiovascular researchers.
We present data from the Heart Rate Variability and Emotion Regulation (HRV-ER) randomized clinical trial testing effects of HRV biofeedback. Younger (N = 121, ages 18-31, 61 female) and older (N = 72, ages 55-80, 45 female) participants completed baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including T 1 -weighted, functional MRI (fMRI), pulsed continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL), and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H MRS). They also completed an emotion regulation task during fMRI. During fMRI scans, physiological measures (blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and end-tidal CO 2 ) were continuously acquired. Participants were randomized to either increase heart rate oscillations or decrease heart rate oscillations during daily sessions. After 5 weeks of HRV biofeedback, they repeated the baseline measurements in addition to a few new measures (ultimatum game fMRI, training mimicking during blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and PCASL fMRI). Participants also wore a wristband sensor to estimate sleep time. Psychological assessment comprised three cognitive tests as well as ten questionnaires related to emotional well-being. Data is publicly available via the OpenNeuro data sharing platform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Healthy adults (n=193). Heart rate variability biofeedback (Osc+) vs. Heart rate variability biofeedback (Osc-) was evaluated. A publicly available multimodal neuroimaging and physiological dataset was generated from a 5-week randomized clinical trial comparing heart rate variability biofeedback to increase versus decrease heart rate oscillations in 193 adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: