Why the study?
Is ambulatory heart rate in day-to-day settings related to affect levels?
Observational (n=186)
Is ambulatory heart rate in day-to-day settings related to affect levels?
Negative affect in everyday life is a reliable predictor of elevated ambulatory heart rate, demonstrating the utility of combining day reconstruction with physiological monitoring.
May inform daily affect monitoring in cardiology; leaves open causal effects on cardiovascular risk.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective studies have linked negative affect with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. This study aims to identify if cardiovascular activity in day-to-day settings is related to affect levels as assessed using the Day Reconstruction Method (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, & Stone, 2004). DESIGN: 186 people underwent baseline physiological testing and were monitored naturalistically for an entire day. Multilevel models were the principal analyses used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We utilized an online day reconstruction survey to produce a continuous account of affect, social interactions, and activity patterns during waking hours. Ambulatory heart rate (HR) was assessed during the same period. Personality, health behavior, consumption, self-reported activity, and baseline physiological characteristics were assessed to isolate the relationships between affect and HR. RESULTS: Negative affect predicted an elevated ambulatory HR and tiredness predicted a lower HR. Associations between negative affectivity and increased cardiovascular reactivity were maintained after taking account of baseline physiological factors, health behavior, and personality. CONCLUSION: Negative affect in everyday life is a reliable predictor of HR. Combining day reconstruction with psychophysiological and environmental monitoring is a minimally invasive method with promising interdisciplinary relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daly et al. (2010) reported an observational. Negative affect was evaluated on Ambulatory heart rate (HR).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: