Key result
Mobile ECMO devices offer severely ill patients refractory to maximal conventional treatment an option for stabilization and transportation, requiring additional logistical and clinical efforts.
Why the study?
Does mobile ECMO provide a viable option for stabilization and transport in patients with therapy-refractory severe hemodynamic or respiratory failure compared to in-hospital ECMO?
Does mobile ECMO provide a viable option for stabilization and transport in patients with therapy-refractory severe hemodynamic or respiratory failure compared to in-hospital ECMO?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mobile ECMO is a viable option for stabilizing and transporting patients with refractory hemodynamic or respiratory failure, though it demands significant logistical and clinical resources.
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal life support emerged as a salvage option in patients with therapy-refractory severe hemodynamic or respiratory failure. However, this promising therapy option has been limited by the use of experienced teams in highly specialized tertiary-care centers. Thus, in order to provide this standard of care in local hospitals and due to increasing evidence on improved outcomes using ECMO devices and setting for patients with heart and lung failure, an increasing number of experienced ECMO centers have launched mobile ECMO retrieval services in recent years. Areas covered: This review provides a summary on the current scientific status concerning use, indications and complications of mobile ECMO devices and services. A scientific literature research was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases using keywords denoted. Expert commentary: Mobile ECMO devices and setting offer severely ill patients refractory to maximal conventional treatment an option of hemodynamic and/or respiratory stabilization and subsequent transportation to specialized care centers for further treatment. Compared to in-hospital ECMO support, out-of-hospital mobile ECMO implantation, transport and retrieval of patients require additional organizational, logistical and clinical efforts. This review provides a summary on the current scientific status concerning use, indications and complications of mobile ECMO services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merkle et al. (2017) conducted a review in Therapy-refractory severe hemodynamic or respiratory failure. Mobile ECMO devices and services vs. In-hospital ECMO support was evaluated. Mobile ECMO devices offer severely ill patients refractory to maximal conventional treatment an option for stabilization and transportation, requiring additional logistical and clinical efforts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: