The integral expressing the frequency response of an optical system in different focal planes in the presence of primary and secondary spherical aberration has been evaluated for a large number of cases employing a Deuce computer, programmed for the numerical integration of double integrals by a method described by Hopkins. Detailed results are given for values of the secondary spherical (wave front) aberration w 60 = -4λ, -6λ, -9λ, -12λ, each with three different amounts of primary aberration and each in five different focal planes; and curves are given showing the frequency response that can be obtained when the performance is optimized for low frequencies according to Hopkins' criterion, where a low frequency is one for which the response is greater than or equal to 0.8. For these low frequencies it is confirmed that an under-corrected marginal ray gives the best image quality. For frequencies greater than that for which the response is approximately 0.6, an over-corrected margin is to be preferred. It is found that, in agreement with the prediction of geometrical optics, the values of the response, D ( s, ψ ), plotted as functions of the product sw 60 (or sw 40 , for the case w 60 = 0), where s is the reduced spatial frequency, lie closely on a single curve, when sw 60 ⩽ 1.2 (or sw 40 ⩽ 0.3, for w 60 = 0).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A M Goodbody (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: