Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Homooligopeptides containing α,α-diethylgycine (=2-amino-2-ethylbutanoic acid), were synthesized by conventional solution methods. An ethyl or methyl ester was used as protecting group at the C-terminus and a trifluoroacetyl group as protecting group at the N-terminus of the peptides. The conformations of such tri-, penta-, and hexapeptides in the solid state were studied using X-ray crystallographic analysis, and were shown to be a bent planar C5-conformation in the case of tripeptide 8a, and a 310-helical structure in the case of pentapeptide 10 and hexapeptide 11. IR and 1H-NMR spectra revealed that the dominant conformation of hexapeptide 11 in CDCl3 solution was not the 310-helical structure shown in the solid state, but a fully planar C5 structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: