Rotational transitions of four isotopic species of bromocyclobutane have been observed. For C4H7Br79,[Complex chemical formula]or[Complex chemical formula]the rotational constants are A = 10 003.4±13 Mc, B = 1629.41±0.03 Mc, C = 1488.48±0.03 Mc; for C4H7Br81, A = 10 002.6±13 Mc, B = 1615.14±0.03 Mc, and C = 1476.50±0.03 Mc. The values for the α-deuterated compound are, for C3H6CDBr79, A = 9534.7±13 Mc, B = 1613.67±0.03 Mc, and C = 1486.24±0.03 Mc; for C3H6CDBr81, A = 9533.4±13 Mc, B = 1599.55±0.03 Mc, and C = 1474.24±0.03 Mc. A set of structural parameters which reproduce these constants within 1.8 Mc were obtained with an electronic computer: bond distances Cα–Cβ = 1.540±0.003 Å, Cβ–Cγ = 1.548±0.003 Å, C–Br = 1.939 Å, C–H = 1.096 Å, and C—D = 1.087 Å; bond angles CβCγCβ = 88° 06′±08′, CβCαCβ = 88°41′±08′, HCγH = 110°44′, HCβH = 108°44′, HCαBr = 111°, angle of CβCαCβ plane with C–Br = 131°00′±08′, and dihedral angle = 29°22′±08′ (the dihedral angle is the angle made by the normals of the CβCαCβ and CβCγCβ planes). The quadrupole-coupling constant of C4H7Br79 along the C–Br bond direction is 512.2±5.0 Mc and the asymmetry parameter ηbond is —0.002±0.014; these figures yield an upper limit of about 1% double-bond character due to conjugation of the Br atom with the C ring and an ionicity of the halogen bonding orbital of 25% assuming 8.6% s character. From frequency and intensity measurements of rotational satellites a low-lying vibrational mode was identified. Its effect is a displacement of all atoms in the molecule (out-of-plane bending). Its first and second excited states are 120±25 and 251±56 cm-1, respectively, above ground level. The three lowest levels of the vibrational mode were shown to be large-amplitude vibrations of the molecule about a dynamical equilibrium dihedral angle of 25° to 29°. Highly excited vibrational states, which cause increasing planarity of the carbon ring, are expected to lead to tunneling through the potential barrier to the less stable ``axial'' isomer of bromocyclobutane. The existence of the axial isomer by direct observation could not be established due to instrumental difficulties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rothschild et al. (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: