Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 21, 2008Annals of Surgery

Short-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PHPeter J. HewettBasil Hetzel InstituteRARandall A. AllardyceThe University of SydneyPBPhilip BagshawCanterbury Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hewett et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8adfe00ca85c7e33dec94ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31818b7595
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer<SUBTITLE>A Randomized Trial</SUBTITLE>2002 · 730 citations
  2. 2Does Conversion of a Laparoscopic Colectomy Adversely Affect Patient Outcome?2004 · 132 citations
  3. 3COLOR: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Resection for Colon Cancer2000 · 175 citations