Key result
Silent myocardial ischaemia is more frequent than symptomatic ischaemia, though its exact mechanisms and current prognostic implications under modern medical therapy remain unclear.
Why the study?
The cause, real prognosis, and whether medical therapy has equalized the risk in silent myocardial ischaemia remain unclear despite countless studies.
Silent myocardial ischaemia is common, particularly in diabetics, but its current prognostic significance and optimal management remain unclear.
Silent ischaemia prevalence data leave its prognostic role and management unclear under modern therapy; prospective studies needed.
Silent myocardial ischaemia (SMI) is defined as objective evidence of ischaemia without angina (or equivalent symptoms) in the presence of coronary artery disease, differing from silent coronary artery disease. Silent myocardial ischaemia represents the majority of episodes of myocardial ischaemia at Holter monitoring. During transient myocardial ischaemia, the symptoms appear after the contraction anomalies of the left ventricle and after the ECG changes. The cause of silent myocardial ischaemia is still not well established. The severity and duration of ischaemia have been theorized as important elements in the SMI mechanism. Another possible mechanism responsible for SMI is represented by changes in the perception of painful stimuli with an increased pain threshold. Finally, a neuronal dysfunction of the diabetic, in post-infarction or a cardiac neuronal 'stunning' could play a role in SMI. In the pre-stent era, the SMI was associated with a worse prognosis. In patients with diabetes mellitus, SMI seems to be more represented because autonomic dysfunction is present in this category of patients. In conclusion, SMI is more frequent than symptomatic ischaemia. However, despite the presence of countless studies on the subject, it is not clear today whether medical therapy has equalized the risk and what the real prognosis of SMI is.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polimeni et al. (2020) conducted a review in Silent myocardial ischaemia. Silent myocardial ischaemia was evaluated. Silent myocardial ischaemia is more frequent than symptomatic ischaemia, though its exact mechanisms and current prognostic implications under modern medical therapy remain unclear.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: