Key result
Heart rate variability biofeedback training increased HRV compared with active control, but showed no differences in EEG, attentional bias, and STAI-JYZ anxiety scores.
Why the study?
Reports on the effectiveness of heart rate variability biofeedback training have been negative, and its effects on anxiety reduction and underlying brain activity changes remain unclear.
Does heart rate variability biofeedback training reduce anxiety and alter brain activity in healthy young students with anxiety?
RCT (n=55)
randomly assigned
Does heart rate variability biofeedback training reduce anxiety and alter brain activity in healthy young students with anxiety?
Heart rate variability biofeedback training successfully increases HRV but does not significantly reduce anxiety or alter EEG brain activity compared to an active control in young students.
HRVBF may boost vmHRV without reducing anxiety or altering EEG markers; leaves open efficacy in selected patients and mechanisms.
Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVBF) is a promising anxiety-reducing intervention that activates the autonomic nervous system through paced breathing, using feedback from heart rate variability (HRV). Many studies have reported the anxiety-reducing effects of HRVBF; however, reports on the effectiveness of training have been negative. Furthermore, the effects of training and the underlying brain activity changes remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the anxiety-reducing effects of HRVBF training and related brain activity changes, by randomly assigning participants, employing an active control group, and measuring anxiety-related attentional bias using the emotional Stroop task and EEG. Fifty-five right-handed healthy young students with anxiety were randomly assigned: finally, 21 to the HRVBF group and 19 to the control group. Both groups performed 10 training sessions of 20 minutes per day within three weeks and were assessed using HRV, EEG, attentional bias, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-JYZ (STAI-JYZ), before and after training. Results showed increased HRV in the HRVBF group compared with the control group, but no differences in EEG, attentional bias, and STAI-JYZ. Further analyses revealed that participants with higher pre-training HRV achieved higher heart rhythm coherence in HRVBF training and had reduced attentional bias. This study suggests that individuals with higher HRV are more likely to be proficient in HRVBF training and benefit from its anxiety-reducing effects. The findings contribute to an understanding of participant selection and modification of HRVBF training protocols for non-responders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in anxiety (n=55). Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVBF) training vs. active control group was evaluated on HRV, EEG, attentional bias, and STAI-JYZ. Heart rate variability biofeedback training increased HRV compared with active control, but showed no differences in EEG, attentional bias, and STAI-JYZ anxiety scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: