Key result
The TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV vaccine was safer than the gE/gI-gene-deleted vaccine in swine, avoiding pathological lesions in brain and lung tissues while providing similar protection.
Why the study?
Pseudorabies causes acute and febrile infectious disease in swine, and a more efficacious vaccine is needed to eradicate the disease.
Does the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV vaccine improve safety and efficacy compared to the gE/gI-gene-deleted vaccine in swine?
Does the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV vaccine improve safety and efficacy compared to the gE/gI-gene-deleted vaccine in swine?
The TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV vaccine is a safer and efficacious candidate for preventing pseudorabies in swine compared to the gE/gI-deleted version.
May inform next-generation PRV vaccine design in swine; leaves open real-world efficacy and safety.
Pseudorabies (PR), caused by pseudorabies virus (PRV), is an acute and febrile infectious disease in swine. To eradicate PR, a more efficacious vaccine needs to be developed. Here, the gE/gI- and TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV (rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI) are constructed through CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/Lox systems. We found that the rGXΔTK/gE/gI was safer than rGXΔgE/gI in mice. Additionally, the effects of rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI were further evaluated in swine. The rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI significantly increased numbers of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in swine, whereas there was no difference between rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI. Moreover, rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI promoted a PRV-specific humoral immune response. The PRV-specific humoral immune response induced by rGXΔgE/gI was consistent with that caused by rGXΔTK/gE/gI. After the challenge, swine vaccinated with rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI showed no clinical signs and viral shedding. However, histopathological detection revealed that rGXΔgE/gI, not rGXΔTK/gE/gI, caused pathological lesions in brain and lung tissues. In summary, these results demonstrate that the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV was safer compared with rGXΔgE/gI in swine. The data imply that the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV may be a more efficacious vaccine candidate for the prevention of PR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) studied Pseudorabies (PR). rGXΔTK/gE/gI vaccine vs. rGXΔgE/gI vaccine was evaluated on Safety (pathological lesions) and efficacy (immune response, clinical signs, viral shedding). The TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV vaccine was safer than the gE/gI-gene-deleted vaccine in swine, avoiding pathological lesions in brain and lung tissues while providing similar protection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: