Key result
Isoflurane post-conditioning reduced infarct size in young rats (56% vs 68% of area at risk) but had no effect in senescent rats (56% vs 56%), possibly due to failure to activate the RISK pathway.
Why the study?
Does isoflurane post-conditioning reduce infarct size in young and senescent rat models of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does isoflurane post-conditioning reduce infarct size in young and senescent rat models of ischemia-reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 68%
Isoflurane post-conditioning protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in young but not senescent hearts, associated with a failure to activate the RISK pathway in older age.
Supports age-dependent efficacy of isoflurane post-conditioning in rat ischemia-reperfusion; hypothesis-generating for age-stratified clinical translation and RISK pathway studies.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the cardioprotective effects of isoflurane administered at the onset of reperfusion in senescent rat in vivo, and the activation of the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) pathway to address a possible mechanism underlying age-related differences. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were assigned to age groups (young, 3-5 months; old, 20-24 months), and randomly selected to receive isoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration) or not for 3 min before and 2 min after reperfusion (ISO postC). Rats were subjected to coronary occlusion for 30 min followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Western blot analysis was used to assess the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), Akt, and GSK3β 15 min after reperfusion. RESULTS: Brief administration of isoflurane 3 min before and 2 min after the initiation of early reperfusion reduced infarct size (56 ± 8% of left ventricular area at risk, mean ± standard deviation) compared with controls (68 ± 4%) in young rats, but had no effect in old rats (56 ± 8% in ISO postC and 56 ± 10% in control, respectively). Phosphorylation of ERK1/2, Akt, and GSK3β were increased in the young ISO postC group but not in the old ISO postC group compared with control groups of the respective ages. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that isoflurane post-conditions the heart in young but not in senescent rats. Failure to activate RISK pathway may contribute to attenuation of isoflurane-induced post-conditioning effect in senescent rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2012) studied Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Isoflurane vs. Control (no isoflurane) was evaluated on Infarct size (% of left ventricular area at risk). Isoflurane post-conditioning reduced infarct size in young rats (56% vs 68% of area at risk) but had no effect in senescent rats (56% vs 56%), possibly due to failure to activate the RISK pathway.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: