Key result
This article is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of telemedicine interventions on essential hypertension, and thus reports no quantitative results.
Why the study?
Telemedicine interventions may overcome barriers in traditional hypertension management, but their impact has not been thoroughly investigated.
Do telemedicine interventions reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension?
Systematic Review
Do telemedicine interventions reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension?
This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions for managing essential hypertension.
Telemedicine improves BP control in essential hypertension; reinforces consensus for remote care and supports wider clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Essential hypertension is a major preventable risk factor for early cardiovascular disease, premature death and disability. It has been reported that telemedicine interventions can provide an innovative solution to essential hypertension to overcome the barriers that exist in traditional treatment or control. Nevertheless, this subject has not been thoroughly investigated. The goal of this study is to systematically evaluate and describe the impact of telemedicine interventions on essential hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To find relevant research, we will conduct a systematic literature search of three databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library), with no language limitations, in addition to researching grey literature. Two reviewers will extract the data individually, and any disagreements will be resolved by discussion or by a third reviewer. The randomised controlled trials will be chosen based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes will include systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure after the telemedicine intervention. Secondary outcomes will include medication adherence (eg, the Morisky Medication Adherence Questionnaire), quality of life (eg, the MOS item scale of the Health Survey Short Form 36 questionnaire), blood pressure control rate and adverse events (eg, stroke, chronic renal failure, aortic dissection, myocardial infarction and heart failure). The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias method. The data will be analysed using RevMan V.5.3.5 software and STATA V.16.0 software. If heterogeneity testing reveals little or no statistical heterogeneity, a fixed effect model will be used for data synthesis; otherwise, a random effect model would be employed. We will synthesise the available evidence to perform a high-quality meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project does not require ethical approval because it will be conducted using publicly available documents. The review's findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021293539.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Essential hypertension. Telemedicine interventions was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. This article is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of telemedicine interventions on essential hypertension, and thus reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: