Key result
Peak flow-mediated dilation values were not significantly different when calculated from preocclusion, occlusion, or postocclusion baselines in children (P=0.208) or adults (P=0.266).
Why the study?
Does the choice of baseline brachial artery measurement time-point (preocclusion, occlusion, or postocclusion) affect the calculation of peak flow-mediated dilation in children and adults?
Observational (n=951)
Does the choice of baseline brachial artery measurement time-point (preocclusion, occlusion, or postocclusion) affect the calculation of peak flow-mediated dilation in children and adults?
p-value: p=0.208 (children), 0.266 (adults)
The choice of baseline brachial artery measurement time-point (preocclusion, occlusion, or postocclusion) does not significantly affect the calculation of peak flow-mediated dilation, suggesting data from studies using different baseline measures can be compared.
Baseline timing does not alter peak FMD; leaves open cross-study comparability pending prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) following reactive hyperaemia can use different time-point measures for baseline diameter. The aim of this study is to compare preocclusion, occlusion and postocclusion baseline brachial artery measurements on the calculation of peak FMD. STUDY DESIGN: Ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery following reactive hyperaemia was conducted in 418 children and 533 adults. Baseline brachial artery measures were a 10-s average before (preocclusion), during (occlusion) and after (postocclusion) hyperaemia. Peak FMD was defined as the greatest percent change from baseline to the peak brachial artery diameter following reactive hyperaemia. RESULTS: Preocclusion, occlusion and postocclusion baseline measures of brachial artery diameter were not significantly different in children (3·15 ± 0·51, 3·14 ± 0·50 versus 3·11 ± 0·50 mm, P = 0·179) or adults (3·81 ± 0·72, 3·81 ± 0·73 versus 3·79 ± 0·73 mm, P = 0·201). Peak FMD values were not significantly different when calculated from preocclusion, occlusion or postocclusion baselines in children (6·77 ± 5·78, 6·93 ± 4·03 versus 7·85 ± 3·62%, P = 0·208) or adults (6·07 ± 5·53, 6·14 ± 3·94 versus 6·62 ± 3·70%, P = 0·266). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in FMD regardless of the baseline brachial artery diameter used in children and adults. Therefore, compilation of data and comparison of results from studies utilizing different measures of baseline brachial diameter may be able to be conducted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostrem et al. (2014) reported an observational. Preocclusion, occlusion, and postocclusion baseline brachial artery measurements was evaluated on Peak flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=0.208 (children), 0.266 (adults)). Peak flow-mediated dilation values were not significantly different when calculated from preocclusion, occlusion, or postocclusion baselines in children (P=0.208) or adults (P=0.266).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: