Key result
Good control of cardiovascular risk factors was associated with lower cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, or non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.83).
Why the study?
Does good control of cardiovascular risk factors reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with stable symptomatic atherothrombotic disease?
Cohort (n=20,588)
Yes
Does good control of cardiovascular risk factors reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with stable symptomatic atherothrombotic disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.83)
Adherence to guideline-recommended targets for major cardiovascular risk factors is associated with a significant reduction in 3-year cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with stable atherothrombotic disease.
Supports risk-factor control in stable atherothrombotic disease; extends observational data but leaves causality open.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of cardiovascular risk factor control on 3-year cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable symptomatic atherothrombotic disease in Europe. METHODS: The REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry recruited patients aged ≥45 years with established atherothrombotic disease or three or more risk factors, of whom 20 588 symptomatic patients from 18 European countries were analysed in this study at baseline and 12, 24 and 36 months. 'Good control' of cardiovascular risk factors was defined as three to five risk factors at target values of international guideline recommendations (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, fasting glycaemia <110 mg/dl, total cholesterol <200 mg/dl, non-smoking). Independent predictors of 'good control' of major risk factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among symptomatic patients in the REACH Registry Europe (mean age 67 years, 70.6% male), 59.4% had good control of risk factors at baseline. Good risk factor control was associated with lower cardiovascular death/non-fatal stroke/non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83) and mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99) at 36 months, compared with poor control. Independent predictors of good control of risk factors included residence in western versus eastern Europe (OR 1.29), high level of education (OR 1.16), established coronary artery disease (OR 1.18), treatment with one or more antithrombotic (OR 1.59) and one or more lipid-lowering agent (OR 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: In REACH, less than 60% of patients with stable atherothrombotic disease had good control of the five major cardiovascular risk factors. Improved risk factor control is associated with a positive impact on 3-year cardiovascular event rates and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cacoub et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in stable symptomatic atherothrombotic disease (n=20,588). Good control of cardiovascular risk factors vs. Poor control was evaluated on cardiovascular death/non-fatal stroke/non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83). Good control of cardiovascular risk factors was associated with lower cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, or non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.83).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: