Key result
Environmental surveillance demonstrated that the proportion of poliovirus-positive wastewater samples was significantly lower during exclusive IPV use (17%) compared to OPV use (84%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) reduce the presence of environmental poliovirus compared to oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV)?
Observational (n=255)
Yes
Does the use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) reduce the presence of environmental poliovirus compared to oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV)?
Sustained transmission of OPV viruses was limited during IPV use, but the continued importation and genetic instability of vaccine strains suggest high vaccine coverage must be maintained globally.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IPV use was associated with lower environmental poliovirus; extends surveillance data but should not yet change global vaccination policy.
This study compares the presence of environmental poliovirus in two Argentinean populations using oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). From January 2003 to December 2005, Córdoba City used IPV in routine infant immunizations, with the exception of intermittent OPV use in August 2005. Between May 2005 and April 2006, we collected weekly wastewater samples in Córdoba City and the province's three major towns, which continued OPV use at all times. Wastewater samples were processed and analyzed for the presence of poliovirus according to WHO guidelines. During the months of IPV use in Córdoba City, the overall proportion of poliovirus-positive samples was 19%. During an intermittent switch from IPV to OPV, this proportion increased to 100% within 2 months. During the 3 months when IPV was reintroduced to replace OPV, a substantial proportion of samples (25%) remained positive for poliovirus. In the OPV-using sites, on average, 54% of samples were poliovirus positive. Seventy-seven percent of poliovirus isolates showed at least one mutation in the VP1-encoding sequence; the maximum genetic divergence from the Sabin strain was 0.7%. Several isolates showed mutations on attenuation markers in the VP1-encoding sequence. The frequency or type of virus mutation did not differ between periods of IPV and OPV use or by virus serotypes. This study indicates that the sustained transmission of OPV viruses was limited during IPV use in a middle-income country with a temperate climate. The continued importation of poliovirus and genetic instability of vaccine strains even in the absence of sustained circulation suggest that high poliovirus vaccine coverage has to be maintained for all countries until the risk of reintroduction of either wild or vaccine-derived poliovirus is close to zero worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mueller et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Poliovirus circulation (n=255). Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV) use vs. Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (OPV) use was evaluated on Proportion of wastewater samples positive for poliovirus (p=<0.001). Environmental surveillance demonstrated that the proportion of poliovirus-positive wastewater samples was significantly lower during exclusive IPV use (17%) compared to OPV use (84%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: