Key result
The Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group has established a protocol using systematic literature reviews and stakeholder engagement to develop a core outcome set for children requiring anesthesia and surgery.
Why the study?
Core outcome sets for pediatric perioperative care cannot be directly extrapolated from adult data, given age-dependent differences and developmental variations in measurement tools.
Systematic Review
This protocol outlines the methodology for developing a standardized core outcome set for pediatric perioperative care to improve research quality and comparability.
Provides framework for consistent pediatric perioperative outcomes; extends research by standardizing measures for future trials and synthesis.
Clinical outcomes are measurable changes in health, function, or quality of life that are important for evaluating the quality of care and comparing the efficacy of interventions. However, clinical outcomes and related measurement tools need to be well-defined, relevant, and valid. In adults, Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology has been used to develop core outcome sets for perioperative care. Systematic literature reviews identified standardized endpoints (StEP) and valid measurement tools, and consensus across a broader range of relevant stakeholders was achieved via a Delphi process to establish Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC). Core outcome sets for pediatric perioperative care cannot be directly extrapolated from adult data. The type and weighting of endpoints within particular domains can be influenced by age-dependent differences in the indications for and/or nature of surgery and medical comorbidities, and the validity and utility of many measurement tools vary significantly with developmental stage and age. The involvement of parents/carers is essential as they frequently act as surrogate responders for preverbal and developmentally delayed children, parental response may influence child outcome, and parental and/or child ranking of outcomes may differ from those of health professionals. Here, we describe the formation of the international Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group, which aims to identify and create validated, broadly applicable, patient-centered outcome measures for infants, children, and young people. Methodologies parallel that of the StEP and COMPAC projects, and systematic literature searches have been performed within agreed age-dependent subpopulations to identify reported outcomes and measurement tools. This represents the first steps for developing core outcome sets for pediatric perioperative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razavi et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Pediatric perioperative care. Core outcome set development was evaluated on Identification of reported outcomes and measurement tools for pediatric perioperative care. The Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group has established a protocol using systematic literature reviews and stakeholder engagement to develop a core outcome set for children requiring anesthesia and surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: