Key result
Brief telephone tobacco cessation counseling by clinical pharmacists did not increase cessation attempts compared to usual care in CVD patients.
Why the study?
Does brief, structured, telephone tobacco cessation counseling delivered by clinical pharmacists increase tobacco cessation attempts in tobacco-using patients with cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=120)
Cluster-randomized
Does brief, structured, telephone tobacco cessation counseling delivered by clinical pharmacists increase tobacco cessation attempts in tobacco-using patients with cardiovascular disease?
Brief telephone tobacco cessation counseling by clinical pharmacists did not significantly increase cessation attempts among patients with cardiovascular disease compared to usual care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brief pharmacist-led telephone counseling confers no benefit for cessation attempts in CVD patients; challenges efficacy of low-intensity telehealth interventions.
Optimal management of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) includes evaluation of risk factors using a team-based approach. Tobacco use often receives less attention than other CVD risk factors; therefore, utilization of nonphysician health care providers may be valuable in addressing tobacco use. The purpose of this trial was to assess the impact of brief, structured, telephone tobacco cessation counseling (BST) delivered by clinical pharmacists on tobacco cessation attempts compared to usual care. The BST consisted of 1 to 5 minutes discussing 3 key counseling points, including a recommendation to quit and education about cessation aids. This was a cluster-randomized trial of tobacco-using patients with CVD who were enrolled in a clinical pharmacist-managed, physician-directed, CVD disease state management service. Clinical pharmacists were randomized to provide usual care (control) or BST (intervention) to their tobacco-using patients during a 4-month period. Patients were surveyed 3 months later to assess their tobacco cessation attempts, use of tobacco cessation aids, and self-reported cessation. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled. Subjects were predominately white males, aged ≥65 years, with a history of myocardial infarction. One hundred and four subjects completed the follow-up survey. No differences were detected between the 36.2% and 38.6% of control and intervention subjects, respectively, reporting a tobacco cessation attempt (P=0.804) or in the other outcomes (all P>0.05). A BST delivered by clinical pharmacists may not adequately affect patient motivation enough to increase tobacco cessation attempts in tobacco-dependent patients with CVD. Future research is needed to evaluate other team-based strategies that can decrease tobacco use in patients with CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease and tobacco use (n=120). Brief, structured, telephone tobacco cessation counseling (BST) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Tobacco cessation attempts (p=0.804). Brief telephone tobacco cessation counseling by clinical pharmacists did not increase cessation attempts compared to usual care in CVD patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: