Key result
AFA-scuPA lysed thrombi sixfold more rapidly than scuPA and TPA (P<0.001) and produced fewer antihemostatic effects at equivalent thrombolytic doses.
Why the study?
Thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality in acute myocardial infarction but current agents have significant limitations.
Does a fibrin-targeted plasminogen activator (AFA-scuPA) improve thrombolytic potency and reduce antihemostatic effects compared to rTPA or rscuPA in a baboon thrombosis model?
Does a fibrin-targeted plasminogen activator (AFA-scuPA) improve thrombolytic potency and reduce antihemostatic effects compared to rTPA or rscuPA in a baboon thrombosis model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fibrin-targeted hybrid plasminogen activator demonstrates superior thrombolytic potency and fewer antihemostatic effects compared with rTPA and rscuPA in a non-human primate model.
Background Thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but significant limitations exist with the use of currently available agents. In the present report, we describe the thrombolytic and antithrombotic potencies of a hybrid recombinant plasminogen activator consisting of an antifibrin antibody 59D8 (AFA) and low-molecular-weight single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scuPA). Methods and Results A thrombolysis model in which thrombi are preformed in vivo in juvenile baboons was developed to compare the potencies of AFA-scuPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA), and recombinant scuPA (rscuPA) in lysing nonocclusive 111 In-labeled platelet-rich arterial-type thrombi and 125 I-labeled fibrin-rich venous-type thrombi. Systemic infusion of 1.89 nmol/kg AFA-scuPA produced thrombolysis that was comparable to that obtained with much higher doses of TPA (14.2 nmol/kg) and rscuPA (28.5 nmol/kg). When steady-state plasma concentrations are normalized, AFA-scuPA lyses thrombi sixfold more rapidly than scuPA and TPA ( P <.001) and reduces the rate of formation more than comparable doses of rscuPA ( P <.0001). At equivalent thrombolytic doses, AFA-scuPA produced fewer antihemostatic effects than either rTPA or rscuPA. Template bleeding time measurements were shorter (3.5±0.12 minutes for AFA-scuPA versus 5.3±0.36 and 5.2±0.04 minutes for rTPA and rscuPA, respectively; P <.05), α 2 -antiplasmin consumption was less ( P <.05), and d -dimer generation was lower ( P <.05). Conclusions We conclude that antibody targeting of scuPA to fibrin increases thrombolytic and antithrombotic potencies with less impairment of hemostasis compared with rTPA and rscuPA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Runge et al. (1996) studied Thrombolysis / Acute myocardial infarction. AFA-scuPA vs. rTPA (14.2 nmol/kg) and rscuPA (28.5 nmol/kg) was evaluated on Lysis of nonocclusive arterial-type and venous-type thrombi (p=<.001). AFA-scuPA lysed thrombi sixfold more rapidly than scuPA and TPA (P<0.001) and produced fewer antihemostatic effects at equivalent thrombolytic doses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: