Systematic review reveals cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies in dementia, indicating support for clinical guidelines despite omitted capacity constraints.
INTRODUCTION Timely diagnosis of dementia is a public health priority to enable risk modification and treatment access. This study systematically identifies and critically appraises health economic models of dementia assessment and diagnosis. METHODS Inclusion criteria were: any dementia stage; evaluated strategy(ies) for initial assessment/diagnosis of dementia; health economic evaluation using decision modeling. Ten databases were searched for 2000–2024. Philips checklist was applied for quality assessment. Narrative synthesis appraised methodological features and issued decision‐making recommendations. RESULTS Thirty‐two studies were included. Six evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); 11 neuroimaging including amyloid‐targeting positron emission tomography; three blood‐based biomarkers; two genetic testing; and 10 early assessment/diagnosis strategies. Methodological limitations included non‐consideration of capacity constraints. Decision‐making recommendations generally affirmed current clinical guidelines: for example, CSF to confirm Alzheimer's disease is cost‐effective (incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of £10,150 per quality‐adjusted life‐year gained vs. no use). DISCUSSION Methodological appraisal and decision‐making recommendations should assist model development and evidence‐based dementia diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: