Key result
The presence of left ventricular false tendons did not significantly affect the development of adverse left ventricular remodeling or secondary mitral regurgitation at 1-year follow-up in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that left ventricular false tendons might attenuate left ventricular remodeling and secondary mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction via a constraint mechanism.
Does the presence of left ventricular false tendons attenuate left ventricular remodeling and secondary mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=71)
Blinded outcome assessment
No
Does the presence of left ventricular false tendons attenuate left ventricular remodeling and secondary mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction?
In patients with mild to moderate LV dysfunction post-myocardial infarction, the presence of left ventricular false tendons does not attenuate LV remodeling or the development of secondary mitral regurgitation.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular false tendons (LVFT) are common structures visualized on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The present study tested the hypothesis that LVFT, via a possible 'constraint' mechanism, attenuate left ventricular (LV) remodeling and secondary mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Seventy-one patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit following an ST-elevation (n = 63) or non-ST-elevation (n = 8) myocardial infarction were analyzed; 29 (41%) had LVFT, and 42 (59%) did not (no-LVFT). All had a TTE and at least 1 follow-up study after revascularization. The χ² analysis, Student's t-test, and Mann Whitney U test were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean age (64 vs. 66 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41% vs. 39%), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) index (23 mm/m² for both), and prevalence of ≥ moderate secondary/functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (17% vs. 14%) were similar between the LVFT and no-LVFT groups. At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in chamber remodeling amongst the LVFT versus no-LVFT group when assessed by: 1) ≥ 10% decrease in the relative LVEF (24% vs. 26%; p = 0.83); 2) ≥ 10% increase in the LVEDd index (41% vs. 38%, p = 0.98); and, 3) ≥ 10% increase in the LV mass index (48% vs. 41%, p = 0.68). There was no difference in the prevalence of ≥ moderate secondary/functional MR (17% vs. 12%, p = 0.77). Outcomes remained similar when stratifying by LVFT morphology or ischemic territory. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild to moderate LV dysfunction and normal chamber size, LVFT do not affect the development of LV remodeling or secondary/functional MR post-myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Presti et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=71). Left ventricular false tendons (LVFT) vs. No left ventricular false tendons (no-LVFT) was evaluated on Chamber remodeling (≥ 10% increase in the LVEDd index) (p=0.98). The presence of left ventricular false tendons did not significantly affect the development of adverse left ventricular remodeling or secondary mitral regurgitation at 1-year follow-up in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: