Key result
EEG-based models best detected engagement (f-beta 0.86), while facial expression models best detected planning (f-beta 0.78) and shifting (f-beta 0.81).
Why the study?
Detecting cognitive profiles is critical for adaptive learning systems to automatically adjust content according to a learner's cognitive states and skills.
Observational (n=127)
EEG and facial expressions contain important and different cues that can be used to automatically and non-intrusively detect cognitive states and skills.
May enable adaptive learning via multimodal monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before educational use.
Detecting cognitive profiles is critical to efficient adaptive learning systems that automatically adjust the content delivered depending on the learner's cognitive states and skills. This study explores electroencephalography (EEG) and facial expressions as physiological monitoring tools to build models that detect two cognitive states, namely, engagement and instantaneous attention, and three cognitive skills, namely, focused attention, planning, and shifting. First, while wearing a 14-channel EEG Headset and being videotaped, data has been collected from 127 subjects taking two scientifically validated cognitive assessments. Second, labeling was performed based on the scores obtained from the used tools. Third, different shallow and deep models were experimented in the two modalities of EEG and facial expressions. Finally, the best performing models for the analyzed states are determined. According to the used performance measure, which is the f-beta score with beta = 2, the best obtained results for engagement, instantaneous attention, and focused attention are EEG-based models with 0.86, 0.82, and 0.63 scores, respectively. As for planning and shifting, the best performing models are facial expressions-based models with 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. The obtained results show that EEG and facial expressions contain important and different cues and features about the analyzed cognitive states, and hence, can be used to automatically and non-intrusively detect them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerdawy et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Cognitive states and skills (n=127). EEG and facial expressions was evaluated on Detection of cognitive states and skills measured by f-beta score (beta = 2). EEG-based models best detected engagement (f-beta 0.86), while facial expression models best detected planning (f-beta 0.78) and shifting (f-beta 0.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: