Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: We aimed to compare the clinical and the biochemical features of the ovulatory versus anovulatory phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: This is a retrospective controlled trial conducted among the women who applied to the İstanbul Liv Vadi Hospital between 2021 and 2023 August and diagnosed as PCOS. PCOS patients (n=290) were diagnosed according to the Rotterdam 2003consensus criteria. Women’s clinical and biochemical parameters such as age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist, hip, waist/hip ratio (WHR), fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin, homeostatic model-assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), antimullerian hormone (AMH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) total cholesterol,triglyceride, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) of participants were compared between ovulatory and anovulatory phenotypes. Results: The findings of the study did not demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between ovulatory and anovulatory phenotypes in relation to various factors, including height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, WHR, insulin levels, HOMA-IR, AMH, FSH, E2, TSH, total cholesterol, testosterone, free testosterone, DHEAS, LDL and cholesterol (p-value>0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of age, FBS, BMI, LH, and HDL levels. Conclusion: In conclusion, there is no significant difference in PCOS’s ovulatory and anovulatory phenotypes in essential parameters such as insulin resistance and BMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MADENLİ et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: