Key result
A chest-belt derived DFA-a1 of 0.75 closely estimated gas exchange VT1 in a non-fatigued state (V̇O2 mean bias -0.5 ml/kg/min; 95% LoA -6.8 to 5.8), but accuracy decreased with acute fatigue.
Why the study?
To investigate the accuracy of heart rate variability DFA-a1 for determining the first ventilatory threshold in runners using a consumer-grade chest belt and explore acute fatigue effects.
Does a chest-belt derived HRV DFA-a1 of 0.75 accurately determine the first ventilatory threshold compared to gas exchange in runners?
Observational (n=14)
Does a chest-belt derived HRV DFA-a1 of 0.75 accurately determine the first ventilatory threshold compared to gas exchange in runners?
Mean Difference: -0.5 (95% CI -6.8–5.8)
A chest-belt derived DFA-a1 of 0.75 is closely related to gas exchange VT1 in a non-fatigued state, providing a useful method for exercise intensity demarcation.
Consumer chest-belt DFA-a1 at 0.75 approximates VT1 in non-fatigued runners; leaves open accuracy and utility during acute fatigue.
Purpose The short-term scaling exponent alpha1 of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA-a1) of heart rate variability (HRV) has shown potential to delineate the first ventilatory threshold (VT1). The aims of this study were to investigate the accuracy of this method for VT1 determination in runners using a consumer grade chest belt and to explore the effects of acute fatigue.Methods We compared oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and heart rate (HR) at gas exchange VT1 to V̇O2 and HR at a DFA-a1 value of 0.75. Gas exchange and HRV data were obtained from 14 individuals during a treadmill run involving two incremental ramps. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression.Results Bland-Altman analysis between gas exchange and HRV V̇O2 and HR at VT1 during the first ramp showed a mean (95% limits of agreement) bias of −0.5 (−6.8 to 5.8) ml∙kg−1∙min−1, and −0.9 (−12.2 to 10.5) beats∙min−1, with R2 of 0.83 and 0.56, respectively. During the second ramp, the differences were −7.3 (−18.1 to 3.5) ml∙kg−1∙min−1 and −12.3 (−30.4 to 5.9) beats∙min−1, with R2 of 0.62 and 0.43, respectively.Conclusion A chest-belt derived DFA-a1 of 0.75 is closely related to gas exchange VT1, with the variability in accuracy at an individual level being similar to gas exchange methods. This suggests this to be a useful method for exercise intensity demarcation. The altered relationship during the second ramp indicates that DFA-a1 is only able to accurately demarcate exercise intensity thresholds in a non-fatigued state, but also opens opportunities for fatigue-based training prescription.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hooren et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy runners (n=14). DFA-a1 of heart rate variability (value of 0.75) vs. Gas exchange VT1 was evaluated on Agreement in oxygen uptake (V̇O2) at VT1 during the first ramp (mean bias -0.5 ml∙kg−1∙min−1, 95% CI -6.8 to 5.8). A chest-belt derived DFA-a1 of 0.75 closely estimated gas exchange VT1 in a non-fatigued state (V̇O2 mean bias -0.5 ml/kg/min; 95% LoA -6.8 to 5.8), but accuracy decreased with acute fatigue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: