Key result
Among 112 surveyed nurses in Italy, 60% are authorized to perform ICM implantations and 70% manage remote monitoring, though only 33% have written hospital protocols for implantation.
Why the study?
Current practices, hospital protocols, and nurses' perceptions regarding nurse-led ICM implantations and remote follow-ups in Italy had not been evaluated.
Cross-Sectional (n=112)
Yes
Nurse-led ICM implantation and remote follow-up are common and perceived as safe by practitioners in Italy, though widespread adoption is limited by a lack of standardized written protocols.
Nurse-led ICM programs appear established in Italy with high satisfaction; leaves open whether standardized protocols and prospective data support broader adoption.
AIMS: This project aimed to evaluate current practices of trained nurses performing implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) implantations and remote follow-ups in Italy, assessing hospital protocols and nurses' perceptions. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted among 163 trained nurses across 75 Italian hospitals, focusing on their ICM implantation and remote monitoring practices. Data collected included hospital characteristics and protocols, barriers to implementation, and nurses' feedback on their experiences. RESULTS: Of the 112 respondents (69% response rate), 60% reported that nurses in their hospitals are authorized to perform ICM implantations, and 70% said that they can manage all remote monitoring tasks. Thirty-three (29%) nurses manage all aspects of ICM patient care, including implantation, programming, enrollment in remote monitoring, training, data review, and follow-up. Fifty-five percent of nurses perform a part of ICM implants outside the EP/Cath lab, and for 31%, this is the primary location. 84% of implanter nurses achieved autonomy after < 10 supervised implants. More than 90% of implanter nurses consider ICM implantation rewarding and 96% find it safe and easy with the provided kit. However, only 33% and 17% of nurses had written protocols at their hospital, to guide ICM implantation and remote monitoring, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led ICM implantation and remote follow-up are becoming established practices in Italy, with many nurses operating independently. Despite this progress, the absence of standard operating procedures limits the widespread adoption of these practices. Clear national and international protocols are essential to enhance nurse training, ensure safe practices, and ultimately improve patient care in ICM management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cervellione et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in ICM implantation and remote follow-up management (n=112). Nurse-led ICM implantation and remote follow-up was evaluated on Current practices, hospital protocols, and nurses' perceptions. Among 112 surveyed nurses in Italy, 60% are authorized to perform ICM implantations and 70% manage remote monitoring, though only 33% have written hospital protocols for implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: