Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eight imidazole-based compounds 4-methyl-2,6-bis(4,5-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenol ( A-dp), 2-(1H-phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazol-2-yl)phenol ( B-2H), 5-methoxy-2-(1H-phenanthro[9,10-d]imidazol-2-yl)phenol ( B-2H4M), 3-(1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthrolin-2-yl)phenol ( C-3H), 2-(1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthrolin-2-yl)-4-methoxyphenol ( C-2H5M), 4-(1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthrolin-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenol ( C-4H3M), 2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline ( C-2M) and 2-(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline ( C-2,4M) were synthesized and characterized by elemental, spectroscopic and X-ray single crystal analyses. Two different crystals of A-dp were grown from ethanol and THF, which revealed that A-dp crystallizes in a monoclinic (P2(1)/c) space group while A-dp·2THF crystallizes in a triclinic (P) space group. A-dp·2THF was devoid of any kind of networks whereas the absence of solvent adducts in the ethanol sample produces 1-dimensional single-stranded helices. Contrary to the reported literature conclusion that 1H-imidazole alkylation should increase the donor strength of the imidazole N-base, protonation–deprotonation equilibrium studies on the compounds suggest that push/pull of electron density on the 2-carbon of the imidazole ring by electron-rich/electron-withdrawing substituents is necessary to influence donor capacity of the N-base electrons. Furthermore, the notable increase in pKa,N: values due to ortho/para-directing methoxy substituents supports the conclusion that electron density push towards the 2-position of the imidazole ring is important for improving N-base donor strengths. DFT calculation results using the B3LYP/6-311+G level of theory were conducted to explore possible theoretical explanations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eseola et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: