Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a system architecture that uses high-efficiency processors as opposed to high-performance processors, NAND flash as byte-addressable main memory, and high-speed DRAM as a cache front-end for the flash. The main memory system is interconnected and presents a unified global address space to the client microprocessors. A single cabinet contains 2,550 nodes, networked in a highly redundant modified Moore graph that yields a bisection bandwidth of 9.1 TB/s and a worst-case latency of four hops from any node to any other. At a per-cabinet level, the system supports a minimum of 2.6 petabytes of main memory, dissipates 90 kW, and achieves 2.2 PetaFLOPS. The system architecture provides several features desirable in today's large-scale systems, including a global shared physical address space (and optional support for a global shared virtual space as well), the ability to partition the physical space unequally among clients as in a unified cache architecture (e.g., so as to support multiple VMs in a datacenter), pairwise system-wide sequential consistency on user-specified address sets, built-in checkpointing via journaled non-volatile main memory, memory cost-per-bit approaching that of NAND flash, and memory performance approaching that of pure DRAM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce Jacob (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: