Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The impact of source/drain engineering on the performance of a six-transistor (6-T) static random access memory (SRAM) cell, based on 22 nm double-gate (DG) SOI MOSFETs, has been analyzed using mixed-mode simulation, for three different circuit topologies for low voltage operation. The trade-offs associated with the various conflicting requirements relating to read/write/standby operations have been evaluated comprehensively in terms of eight performance metrics, namely retention noise margin, static noise margin, static voltage/current noise margin, write-ability current, write trip voltage/current and leakage current. Optimal design parameters with gate-underlap architecture have been identified to enhance the overall SRAM performance, and the influence of parasitic source/drain resistance and supply voltage scaling has been investigated. A gate-underlap device designed with a spacer-to-straggle ( s /σ) ratio in the range 2–3 yields improved SRAM performance metrics, regardless of circuit topology. An optimal two word-line double-gate SOI 6-T SRAM cell design exhibits a high SNM ∼ 162 mV, I wr ∼ 35 µA and low I leak ∼ 70 pA at V DD = 0.6 V, while maintaining SNM ∼ 30% V DD over the supply voltage ( V DD ) range of 0.4–0.9 V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashmi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: