Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electroproduction inelastic structure functions Wᵢ(κ, ν) ($i=1, 2$; κ=q²=momentumtransfersquared; ν=q·p=energytransfer; p²=1) are studied in the Bjorken (A) limit (ν→∞, ρ≡-νκ fixed) and in the Regge (R) limit (ν→∞, κ fixed). Finite A limits [F₂(ρ)=limνW₂(κ, ν), F₁(ρ)=limW₁(κ, ν)] and Pomeranchuk-dominated R limits [w²(κ)ν^-1=limW₂, w₁(κ)ν=limW₁] are assumed. These two limits are first related by use of Deser-Gilbert-Sudarshan (DGS) representations for causal functions Vᵢ(κ, ν) related to the Wᵢ by W₂=κV₂ and W₁=κV₁-ν²V₂. The above A- and R-limit assumptions, together with a smoothness assumption on the DGS spectral functions motivated by the existence of some equal-time commutators, are shown to imply that F₂(∞)=w₂(-∞)≡w₂=const and ${lim}_{{ρ}{→}{∞}}{{F}₁({ρ})}{{ρ}}={-}{lim}_{{κ}{→}{-}{∞}}{w}₂({κ}){κ}{≡}{w}₁=const$. These results agree with experiment if ${w}ᵢ{≠}0$. The properties of the spectral functions that are obtained are used to discuss some equal-time commutators and properties of the photon structure function and the cross section ${{σ}}_{{γ}}({ν})$. The empirical value of ${{σ}}_{{γ}}({∞})$ is used to roughly calculate ${w}₂$. It is stressed, however, that the above assumptions do not preclude the possibility that ${w}₂=0$. The Fourier transforms ${{^}{W}}ᵢ({x}², p·{}x)$ of the ${W}ᵢ({κ}, {ν})$ are next studied and used to again relate the $A$ and $R$ limits. Restrictions on the ${W}ᵢ$ imposed by the requirements of finite $A$ limits and correct $R$ limits are determined and results equivalent to the above ones are obtained. This analysis determines the configuration-space behavior corresponding to the $A$ and $R$ limits for large ${ρ}$ and ${κ}$, respectively. These limits are shown to determine the behavior of the ${{^}{W}}ᵢ$ near the light cone ${x}²=0$, and the results are that ${π}{{^}{W}}₂{~}{δ}({x}²)1/2{ε}({x}₀){{^}{f}}₂({x}₀)$ and ${π}{W}₁{~}{{δ}}^{{'}}({x}²)2|{x}₀|{{^}{f}}₁({x}₀)$ for ${x}²{~}0$, where ${w}₂=1/2i{∫}d{x}₀{{^}{f}}₂({x}₀)$ and ${w}₁=2i[{f}₁({∞}){-}{{^}{f}}₁({-}{∞})]$. Corresponding properties of the ${V}ᵢ$ are derived, and the equivalence of this approach with the one using integral representations is established. The light-cone behavior of each component of $〈p|[{J}_{{μ}}(x), {J}_{{ν}}(0)]|p〉$ can be determined, and it is shown in particular that $〈p|[{J}₀{-}{J}₃, {J}₀{-}{J}₃]|p〉{~}{δ}({x}²){ε}({x}₀){{^}{f}}₂({x}₀)$, apart from total derivatives with respect to ${x}₀{-}{x}₃$. The light-cone behavior equivalent to the Fubini-Dashen-Gell-Mann sum rule is then put in a form which can accommodate this result so well that we are led to propose a highly symmetric universal structure for the light-cone commutator of two SU(3) currents. The universality is made precise by use of the [SU(3)SU(3)]_β equal-time commutation relations. The equal-time implications of the proposal are considered and are shown to be consistent with, and suggested by, the gluon mode. In the context of this model, w₂ is numerically estimated and found to agree with the experimental value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Brandt (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: