The present study examined the effects of a series of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) derivatives on the diameter of renal arterioles to determine the structural requirements of the vasoconstrictor response to 20-HETE. The vascular responses to 5-, 8-, 12-, 15-, 19-, 20-, 21-HETEs, arachidonic acid (AA), and saturated, partially saturated, dimethyl, carboxyl, and 19-carbon derivatives of 20-HETE (10(-8) to 10(-6) M) were assessed in rat renal interlobular arteries (65-125 micrometer). 20-HETE, 21-HETE, dimethyl-20-HETE, and a partially saturated derivative of 20-HETE, 20-hydroxyeicosa-5(Z),14(Z)-dienoic acid, reduced vessel diameter by 19 +/- 3, 17 +/- 3, 16 +/- 2, and 28 +/- 2%, respectively. In contrast, 5-, 8-, 12-, 15-, and 19-HETE, AA, saturated, partially saturated, carboxyl, and the 19-carbon derivatives of 20-HETE had no effect on vessel diameter. Pretreatment with 5-, 15-, and 19-HETE, the 19-carbon derivative or 20-hydroxyeicosa-6(Z),15(Z)-dienoic acid (1 microM) completely blocked the vasoconstrictor response to 20-HETE in renal arterioles. Pretreatment with AA, carboxyl, saturated 19-carbon, and saturated 20-HETE derivatives (1 microM) partially blocked the response, whereas 8- and 12-HETE (1 microM) had no effect on the vasoconstrictor response to 20-HETE. These findings suggest that 20-HETE agonists and antagonists require a carboxyl or an ionizable group on carbon 1 and a double bond near the 14 or 15 carbon. 20-HETE agonists also require a functional group capable of hydrogen bonding on carbon 20 or 21, whereas antagonists lack this reactive group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alonso‐Galicia et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: