Why the study?
Does bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy improve progression-free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on baseline CAF levels?
Does bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy improve progression-free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on baseline CAF levels?
A baseline plasma biomarker signature of HGF, VEGF-A121, and ANGPTL4 may identify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are most likely to benefit from first-line bevacizumab therapy.
Should not yet guide bevacizumab selection in mCRC; hypothesis-generating for CAF signature validation in prospective trials.
This study intends to identify biomarkers that could refine the selection of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for bevacizumab treatment. Pretreatment 36 plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) were first measured by protein microarray analysis in patients who received first-line bevacizumab-containing therapies (discovery cohort, n = 64), and further evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients treated on regimens with or without bevacizumab (validation cohort, n = 186). Factor levels were correlated with clinical outcomes, predictive values were assessed using a treatment by marker interaction term in the Cox model. Patients with lower pretreatment levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) or VEGF-A(121) gain much more benefit from bevacizumab treatment as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) levels negatively correlated with PFS and response rate following bevacizumab (all adjusted interaction P < 0.05). A baseline CAF signature combining these three markers has greater predictive ability than individual markers. Signature-negative patients showed impaired survival following bevacizumab treatment (PFS, 7.3 vs 7.0 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; OS, 29.9 vs 21.1 months, HR 1.33) compared with signature-positive patients (PFS, 6.5 vs 11.9 months, HR 0.52; OS, 28.0 vs 55.3 months, HR 0.67). These promising results warrant further prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: