Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Because a reservoir undergoing a thermal recovery process is typically idealized as a composite reservoir, this study develops new design and interpretation equations by investigating pressure-derivative behavior of a well in a two-zone, radial, infinite or finite composite reservoir. Accurate design equations help establish the test duration required to observe a particular feature in well test data and thus the applicability of an interpretation method to determine front radius, or swept volume. This study shows that the dimensionless time to the end of the first semilog line (deviation time) based on front radius is a constant. The deviation-time method may be used if wellbore storage does not mask the first semilog line. Design equations for the time of the beginning of the second semilog line and the time to observe outer-boundary effects show that the intersection-time method is not suitable for thermal recovery well test analysis. Correlations developed for the end of pseudosteady-state behavior of the swept region should help select the correct Cartesian line to calculate swept volume. This paper also presents derivative type curves applicable for all front radii, with mobility and storativity ratios as parameters for infinitely large composite reservoirs. For closed and constant-pressure outer boundaries, the ratio of outer boundary to front radius is the third parameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambastha et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: