Why the study?
Antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding and transfusion risk during extracorporeal circulation, and whether reduced goal-directed anticoagulation alleviates severe bleeding in DAPT-treated patients compared with aspirin alone during CABG is unknown.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy compared to aspirin alone increase severe bleeding in patients undergoing CABG with reduced goal-directed anticoagulation?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy compared to aspirin alone increase severe bleeding in patients undergoing CABG with reduced goal-directed anticoagulation?
In patients undergoing CABG with reduced goal-directed anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy increases severe bleeding compared to aspirin alone, though absolute bleeding rates remain low.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support reduced goal-directed anticoagulation to keep severe bleeding low in DAPT-CABG; leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing extracorporeal circulation. Reduced goal-directed anticoagulation is a personalized approach to reduce the anticoagulation based on a lower targeted activated clotting time. We assessed whether reduced goal-directed anticoagulation using optimized extracorporeal circulation alleviates the risk of severe bleeding in patients treated by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to aspirin alone during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A total of 2275 patients undergoing CABG from 2002 to 2022 were selected after propensity matching from a retrospective cohort of 3018 patients. Patients treated with a combination of aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor or clopidogrel were included in the DAPT group (n = 1111). Patients treated with aspirin alone (ASA) constituted the control group (n = 1164). Optimized extracorporeal circulation was conducted under reduced systemic anticoagulation with a target activated clotting time 250 s. Severe bleeding was assessed using 3 validated scores of bleeding: UDPB, E-CABG, and BARC-4. RESULTS: While all scores showed low ranges of severe bleeding (<6%), they were significantly higher after DAPT compared to ASA (P values for UDPB, E-CABG, and BARC-4 at 0.016, 0.006, and 0.063, respectively). Higher maximal activated clotting time was associated with higher rate of transfusion (P < 0.001) and bleeding (P < 0.001) after multivariate adjustment. Mortality was 1.24% in DAPT vs 0.94% in ASA group (P = NS), whereas cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and transient ischaemic attack were low (<1%) and similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher bleeding under DAPT compared to ASA alone, optimized extracorporeal circulation with reduced goal-directed anticoagulation alleviated severe bleeding which remained low in patients undergoing CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eid et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: