This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose Structural variants such as multi-exon deletions and duplications are an important cause of disease, but are often overlooked in standard exome/genome sequencing analysis. We aimed to evaluate the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from exome sequencing (ES) in comparison to genome-wide low-resolution and exon-resolution chromosomal microarrays (CMA), and to characterise the properties of de novo CNVs in a large clinical cohort. Methods We performed CNV detection using ES of 13,462 parent-offspring trios in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study, and compared them to CNVs detected from exon-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in 5,197 probands from the DDD study. Results Integrating calls from multiple ES-based CNV algorithms using random forest machine learning generated a higher quality dataset than using individual algorithms. Both ES- and aCGH-based approaches had the same sensitivity of 89% and detected the same number of unique pathogenic CNVs not called by the other approach. Of DDD probands pre-screened with low resolution CMA, 2.6% had a pathogenic CNV detected by higher resolution assays. De novo CNVs were strongly enriched in known DD-associated genes and exhibited no bias in parental age or sex. Conclusion ES-based CNV calling has higher sensitivity than low-resolution CMAs currently in clinical use, and comparable sensitivity to exon-resolution CMA. With sufficient investment in bioinformatic analysis, exomebased CNV detection could replace low-resolution CMA for detecting pathogenic CNVs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danecek et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: