High pressure liquid chromatography was used to measure a-tocopherol in the retinas of rats reared in a cyclic light or dark environment. These measurements were performed on extracts of whole retinas during the developmental period, 18–60 days, and on isolated ROS from adult animals. Similar α-tocopherol determinations were performed on retinas and isolated ROS following exposure of rats to intense visible light for 24 hr periods.The results show that a-tocopherol is chromatographically separated from the vitamin A derivatives found in the retina and is pure, as judged by mass spectrometry. In the retinas of cyclic light and dark reared rats, a-tocopherol accumulates in an age dependent fashion, so that at 60 days the level is nearly double that of animals at 18–20 days of age (P<0.001). Because the age dependent accumulation of rhodopsin is greater in dark reared rats, the average molar ratio of rhodopsin to α- tocopherol in the retina of dark reared animals is 25% higher than in cyclic light rats. Following exposure of rats to intense visible light for 24 hr periods, a-tocopherol concentrations in the retina were unchanged from the levels in control animals.In adult animals the concentration of a-tocopherol in ROS is 2.5–3.5 times higher than in whole retina. ROS from adult cyclic light reared rats also contain an average of 43% more a-tocopherol per mg protein than ROS from dark maintained animals (P < 0.005). The concentrations of α-tocopherol in ROS from intense light treated rats were 8–10% lower, but not significantly lower than the concentrations in ROS from control animals. However, a-tocopherol in the ROS of intense light exposed rats previously maintained in cyclic light, remained 40% higher than in ROS from dark reared animals. The differences in the rhodopsin to a-tocopherol ratio in retina and a-tocopherol concentrations in ROS from rats of the two light environments suggest that cyclic light reared animals may be better prepared to handle oxidative insult than dark reared rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunt et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: