Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale Infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria are a major clinical challenge. Phage therapy is a promising alternative antibacterial strategy. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous phage therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rats. Methods In a randomized, blinded, controlled experimental study, we compared intravenous teicoplanin (3 mg/kg, n = 12), a cocktail of four phages (2–3 × 109 plaque-forming units/ml of 2003, 2002, 3A, and K; n = 12), and a combination of both (n = 11) given 2, 12, and 24 hours after induction of pneumonia, and then once daily for 4 days. The primary outcome was survival at Day 4. Secondary outcomes were bacterial and phage densities in lungs and spleen, histopathological scoring of infection within the lungs, and inflammatory biomarkers in blood. Measurements and Main Results Treatment with either phages or teicoplanin increased survival from 0% to 58% and 50%, respectively (P < 0.005). The combination of phages and antibiotics did not further improve outcomes (45% survival). Animal survival correlated with reduced bacterial burdens in the lung (1.2 × 106 cfu/g of tissue for survivors vs. 1.2 × 109 cfu/g for nonsurviving animals; P < 0.0001), as well as improved histopathological outcomes. Phage multiplication within the lung occurred during treatment. IL-1β increased in all treatment groups over the course of therapy. Conclusions Phage therapy was as effective as teicoplanin in improving survival and decreasing bacterial load within the lungs of rats infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Combining antibiotics with phage therapy did not further improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prazák et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: