Bistatic radar cross section (RCS) is computed from cylindrical near-field measurements obtained in a radio anechoic chamber with the target illuminated by a compact-range reflector. Near-field measurement is convenient where the RCS of complex targets is not amenable to computation or where computational results require experimental confirmation. A companion paper addresses the theory of cylindrical near-field scanning with reference to our experimental system. RCS of canonical targets derived from near-field measurement are in good agreement with theory. This paper compares the far fields computed from the near-field measurements with numerical solutions. Separating the target-scattered fields from incident and background fields presents a major challenge in an indoor bistatic radar configuration. We discuss the errors introduced by a residue of the incident field that is not canceled by the background subtraction method currently in use. A slow drift in system parameters and probe column oscillations are among the contributing factors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marr et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: