Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electrophoretic mobility of Rhizobium trifolii strain TAl was relatively constant during the early and late phases of growth, but exhibited a temporary sharp increase in the late logarithmic--early stationary phase. The electrophoretic behaviour of slow-growing species of Rhizobium was characterized by zero mobility at pH 2· 0, and a constant negative mobility between pH 4·0 and 10·7. In contrast, all fast-growing strains, except R. trifolii TAl, exhibited slight positive mobility at pH 2· 0, a constant negative mobility between pH 4·0 and 9· 2, and a marked increase in mobility between pH 9·2 and 10·7. These results suggest that the surfaces of the slow-growing bacteria and strain TAl contain only acidic (carboxyl) groups, whereas those of the fast·growing strains contain a predominance of acid groups along with some basic (amino) groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KC Marshall (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: