Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interaction with the physical world differentiates physical AI from other forms of AI. Autonomous driving exemplifies this; vehicles must perceive and respond to dynamic environments with human-like or better perception-reaction times. This survey addresses the fundamental challenge of deploying high-performance models for multimodal fusion in resource-constrained automotive environments. We organise state-of-the-art deep learning approaches into five paradigms—CNN-based, transformer-based, dense BEV-based, sparse-based, and hybrid—revealing trade-offs in accuracy, latency, and efficiency, as well as strengths and limitations in robustness under adverse operational design domains. The hardware-aware perspective is a differentiating contribution, presenting strategies for deployment on automotive platforms, reducing inference latency by up to 50% and improving robustness in adverse conditions by up to 20%. By synthesising sensor fusion, deep learning, compute platforms, and hardware-awareness, this work equips researchers and practitioners with actionable insights and strategies for perception systems, bridging theoretical advances and production-grade autonomous driving requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Power et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: