Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of non-traumatic neurological disability in young adults, with profound implications for personal autonomy, mental health, and social participation. As no Patient-Reported Outcome Measure adequately captures patient autonomy, we developed the Multiple Sclerosis Autonomy Scale (MSAS). The FOCAL-MS 2 study aims to confirm the psychometric properties of the MSAS score. METHODS: Patients included between 01/02/2024 and 19/04/2024 were routinely followed for 12 months throughout France. Health Care Professionals (HCPs) sent patients the 36-item MSAS questionnaire to complete before out-patient visits. Patients also completed the MSAS upon inclusion, 15 (D15), 30 (D30), and 360 (D360) days later. Validation included internal consistency, reliability, unidimensionality, multidimensionality, and construct validity. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients (74.4% females; age 49.7 years) were included. The MSAS presented good internal consistency at inclusion (Cronbach's alpha = 0.845) and good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.72 at D15 and 0.75 at D30). As each dimension was required to maintain consistency, one item was removed to improve the instrument's properties. CONCLUSION: The 35-question MSAS is a valid, consistent, and reliable tool to assess patient autonomy in MS and satisfies patients' and HCPs' needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donzé et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: