Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Due to the rapid development of cryocoolers, conduction-cooled Nb 3 Sn devices are nowadays enabled. A 0.2 MJ conduction-cooled Nb 3 Sn SMES system has been designed and constructed. The nominal current of the coil was 275 A at 10 K. The quench tests have been performed and in this paper the experimental data are compared to the computational one. Due to a slow normal zone propagation, Nb 3 Sn magnets are not necessarily self-protective. In conduction-cooled coils, a thermal interface provides a protection method known as a quench back. The temperature rise in the coil during a quench was measured with a sensor located on the inner radius of the coil. The current decay was also monitored. The measured temperature increased for approximately 15 s after the current had already decayed. This temperature rise is due to the heat conduction from the hot spot. Thus, the measured temperature does not represent the hot-spot temperature. A computational quench model which takes into account quench back and heat conduction after the current decay was developed in order to understand the measured temperatures. According to the results, a quench back due to the eddy current induced heating of the thermal interface of an LTS coil was an adequate protection method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korpela et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: