Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigate the surface passivation of crystalline silicon (c-Si) wafers that are textured with random upright pyramids and passivated with amorphous silicon nitride (SiNₓ). Over a large range of refractive indices$(n$= 1.89–4.1 at 632 nm), we achieve a low upper limit to surface recombination velocity on textured samples (Seff,UL⁻¹$at an excess carrier density of 10$¹⁵$cm$⁻³)$. We also find that$Seff,UL$is higher for textured surfaces than for planar surfaces when the NH$₃$:SiH$₄$ratio is high (and, hence,$n$is low). For example, when passivated by an N-rich SiN$ₓ$deposited with NH$₃$:SiH$₄$= 4.7$(n$= 1.83), the vertices and/or edges of the pyramidal texture drives a 3.5 times increase in$Seff,UL$. As the NH$₃$:SiH$₄$ratio decreases (and$n$increases),$Seff,UL$of the textured surfaces decreases rapidly and approaches the same$Seff,UL$as the planar surfaces when NH$₃$:SiH$₄$≤ 0.7 ($n$≥ 2.3). By contrast, we find that irrespective of NH$₃$:SiH$₄$ratio, and, therefore,$n, Seff,ULis equivalent on 100 and 111 planar surfaces. The results indicate that the increase inSeff,UL$of the textured surfaces is related to the presence of vertices and/or edges of the pyramids rather than to the presence of {111}-orientated facets. By depositing varying degrees of corona charge on the samples, it is found that the increase in recombination introduced by 1) a higher NH₃:SiH₄ratio and 2) the vertices and edges of the pyramids is primarily due to an increase in defect density rather than a decrease in SiNₓcharge density.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: