A comprehensive and systematic investigation of low-cost surface passivation technologies is presented for achieving high-performance silicon devices such as solar cells. Most commercial solar cells today lack adequate surface passivation, while laboratory cells use conventional furnace oxides (CFO) for high-quality surface passivation involving an expensive and lengthy high-temperature step. This investigation tries to bridge the gap between commercial and laboratory cells by providing fast, low-cost methods for effective surface passivation. This paper demonstrates for the first time, the efficacy of TiO/sub 2/, thin (15 for a 90 /spl Omega//sq. emitter, 2) reduce J/sub 0e/ by a factor of >3 for a 40 /spl Omega//sq, emitter, and 3) reduce S/sub back/ below 20 cm/s on 1.3 /spl Omega/cm p-Si. Furthermore, this double-layer RTO+SiN passivation is relatively independent of the deposition conditions (direct or remote) of the SiN film and is more stable under heat treatment than SiN or RTO alone. Model calculations are also performed to show that the RTO+SiN surface passivation scheme may lead to 17%-efficient thin screen-printed cells even with a low bulk lifetime of 20 /spl mu/s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohatgi et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: