Why the study?
Spinal fusion accounts for substantial healthcare expenditures, prompting attention to contain escalating hospital costs across different regions and payer types.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Comparison
Different regions and payer types
May inform cost analyses in spinal fusion; leaves open need for validation before any practice impact.
Back pain continues to be a leading cause of disability in the United States and is one of the most common reasons for seeking consultation with a physician Nonsurgical interventions remain the first-line of therapy; however, many patients eventually progress to a level of severity that requires surgical treatments such as spinal fusion. Spinal fusion has accounted for the highest total cost among the surgical procedures. The Medicare program reported reimbursing US hospitals $3.2 billion for spinal fusion procedures in fiscal year 2011, making it the third largest CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expenditure behind total knee replacement and heart failure. It has also been the focus of attention in investigations to contain hospital costs. The increase in surgical procedures for the management of chronic pain and consequent escalation of healthcare costs has prompted the attention of policy makers as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravi Chinta (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: