Why the study?
The accuracy and consistency of epicardial adipose tissue quantification using non-ECG-gated chest CT scans needed investigation.
Does non-ECG-gated chest CT provide accurate epicardial adipose tissue volume quantification compared to ECG-gated cardiac CT?
Does non-ECG-gated chest CT provide accurate epicardial adipose tissue volume quantification compared to ECG-gated cardiac CT?
Non-ECG-gated chest CT with 1.25 mm slice thickness and 120 kVp provides epicardial adipose tissue volume measurements comparable to standard ECG-gated cardiac CT, offering a viable alternative for assessing coronary artery disease risk.
Non-ECG-gated 120 kVp chest NCCT-1.25 mm yields comparable EAT volumes; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated accuracy and consistency of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) quantification in non-ECG-gated chest computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: EAT volume was semi-automatically quantified using a standard Hounsfield unit threshold (- 190, - 30) in three independent cohorts: (1) Cohort 1 (N = 49): paired 120 kVp ECG-gated cardiac non-contrast CT (NCCT) and 120 kVp non-ECG-gated chest NCCT; (2) Cohort 2 (N = 34): paired 120 kVp cardiac NCCT and 100 kVp non-ECG-gated chest NCCT; (3) Cohort 3 (N = 32): paired non-ECG-gated chest NCCT and chest contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) datasets (including arterial phase and venous phase). Images were reconstructed with the slice thicknesses of 1.25 mm and 5 mm in the chest CT datasets, and 3 mm in the cardiac NCCT datasets. RESULTS: In Cohort 1, the chest NCCT-1.25 mm EAT volume was similar to the cardiac NCCT EAT volume, while chest NCCT-5 mm underestimated the EAT volume by 7.5%. In Cohort 2, 100 kVp chest NCCT-1.25 mm were 13.2% larger than 120 kVp cardiac NCCT EAT volumes. In Cohort 3, the chest arterial CECT and venous CECT dataset underestimated EAT volumes by ~ 28% and ~ 18%, relative to chest NCCT datasets. All chest CT-derived EAT volumes were similarly associated with significant coronary atherosclerosis with cardiac CT counterparts. CONCLUSION: The 120 kVp non-ECG-gated chest NCCT-1.25 mm images produced EAT volumes comparable to cardiac NCCT. Chest CT EAT volumes derived from consistent imaging settings are excellent alternatives to the cardiac NCCT to investigate their association with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: