The Er n Sc 3 - n N@C 80 ( n = 0−3) family of four endohedral fullerenes has been prepared by vaporization of graphite rods packed with 2% Sc 2 O 3 /3% Er 2 O 3 /95% graphite powder in a Krätschmer−Huffman fullerene generator under dynamic flow of helium and dinitrogen. ErSc 2 N@C 80 has been isolated in pure form via three stages of high-pressure liquid chromatography and characterized by mass spectrometry. The first structure of a mixed metal endohedral, ErSc 2 N@C 80, has been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction at 90 K on ErSc 2 N@C 80 ·Co II (OEP)·1.5C 6 H 6 ·0.3CHCl 3, which was obtained by diffusion of a solution of ErSc 2 N@C 80 in benzene into a solution of Co II (OEP) (OEP is the dianion of octaethylporphyrin) in chloroform. The structure of ErSc 2 N@C 80 consists of a planar ErSc 2 N unit surrounded by an icosahedral C 80 cage. The nominal Er−N distance is 2.089(9) Å and the Sc−N distance is, as expected, shorter, 1.968(6) Å. Despite its location within the C 80 cage, the ErSc 2 N unit displays a remarkable degree of order within the solid-state structure. The metal ions make close contact with individual carbon atoms of the cage with shortest Sc−C distances, in the range of 2.03−2.12 Å, and shortest Er−C distances of 2.20 and 2.22 Å. Two different, but equally populated, orientations of the I h C 80 cage were required to describe the fullerene portion of the structure. Although these C 80 cages are located on a crystallographic mirror plane, that plane does not coincide with a mirror plane of the cages themselves. Consequently, the cage is disordered over four superimposed sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olmstead et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: