Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objective External mechanical efficiency (EME%) and ventilatory efficiency (VEF) reflect endurance performance, yet comparisons between well-trained (WT) and less-trained (LT) runners during incremental exercise are limited. This study examined stage-specific changes in EME% and VEF during a graded treadmill test and evaluated whether individuals can self-select appropriate treadmill speeds for a VO 2 max protocol. Methods Thirty-six runners (19 WT, 17 LT) completed a Modified Astrand VO 2 max Treadmill protocol. EME% was calculated as vertical work rate relative to metabolic rate, and VEF as the lowest VE/VCO 2 value from three consecutive 15-second intervals. A linear mixed-effects model assessed EME% across stages, and a two-way ANCOVA and ANOVA examined effects of sex and training status on VEF and test duration. Results EME% showed significant effects of stage and group, with a stage × group interaction (p < 0.05). WT runners demonstrated greater EME% than LT runners at higher stages (3–5; all p < 0.05). VEF differed by sex (males: 27.49±4.09; females: 29.96±2.92, p = .017) but not by training status (p = 0.48). Although self-selected starting intensities differed from recommended values (55% LT; 77.5% for WT), self-selected treadmill speeds produced group mean test durations consistent with the recommended 8-12 minute duration, and all participants achieved valid VO 2 peak values. Conclusion The EME% advantage of trained runners is stage-dependent, emerging at higher exercise intensities. VEF appears influenced by sex rather than training status. Despite differing from previously recommended starting intensities, self-selected treadmill speeds produced valid VO 2 peak tests across training groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamilton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: