Why the study?
Although diabetes mellitus increases the incidence of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in short hydration regimens, the effect of prediabetes remained unclear.
Does prediabetes increase the incidence of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in lung cancer patients receiving short hydration?
Does prediabetes increase the incidence of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in lung cancer patients receiving short hydration?
Prediabetes does not significantly increase the incidence of clinical cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, despite causing statistically significant but small worsening of serum creatinine and creatinine clearance.
Prediabetes may warrant closer CIN monitoring with cisplatin; leaves open need for prospective confirmation before practice change.
Background/Aim: Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is one of the most attention-requiring adverse effects. We have reported that diabetes mellitus significantly increases the incidence of CIN in a short hydration method in real-world lung cancer treatment. However, the effect of prediabetes on CIN development remains unclear. This study investigated whether patients with prediabetes exhibit CIN at a greater rate during real-world cisplatin-including treatments as a subgroup analysis. Patients and Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin treatment (≥75 mg/m2) from May 2014 to January 2021 (n=169). Patients were divided into a prediabetes group (baseline HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) and a control group (baseline HbA1c <5.7%). The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of CIN in all treatment cycles between the two groups. We also assessed variations in serum creatinine (SCr) levels and creatinine clearance (CCr). Results: CIN occurred in 4.7% of controls and 8.3% of patients with prediabetes in all cycles, with no significant difference (p=0.37). In contrast, variation of SCr levels and CCr was significantly worse in the prediabetes group [median variation level (range) 0.11 mg/dl (−0.11-0.46 mg/dl) and 0.12 mg/dl (−0.02-1.08 mg/d) in controls and prediabetes, p=0.04 for SCr; −12.9 ml/min (−54.1-4.9 ml/min) and −16.3 ml/min (−49.4-3.0 ml/min), p=0.02 for CCr, respectively]. These results were also confirmed during the first cycle of treatment. Conclusion: Patients with prediabetes did not develop problematic CIN, although they exhibited significant increases in SCr and decreases in CCr.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: