Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reflects on the purpose of Mark. It takes it departure from the ‘false Christs’ of Mark 13: the θεος ἀνήρ (‘divine man’) contention for the refutation of which as purported by Weeden (1968), and others (RP Martin, N Perrin, L Schenke, E Schweizer) Mark wrote his gospel. It rejects the argument of Weedon, and others, that Mark wrote his gospel to refute a θεος ἀνήρ (‘divine man’) heresy. It then proceeds to present what the author himself believes the most tenable reason for the writing of Mark. It concludes with the observation of Vorster, WS (1985) touching the purpose of Mark, and a final word from the author.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schalk Willem Cronjé (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: