Why the study?
Does swimming training reduce systolic blood pressure and alter cardiac myosin polymorphism in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Does swimming training reduce systolic blood pressure and alter cardiac myosin polymorphism in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Swimming training in spontaneously hypertensive rats prevents the shift towards myosin V3 and reduces systolic blood pressure, potentially improving the heart's ability to cope with sudden physical or emotional stress.
May inform exercise research in hypertension models; leaves open clinical translation of myosin effects.
Cardiac muscle can adapt to different functional demands, as evidenced by polymorphism of myosin. Pressure load in spontaneously hypertensive rats induced a shift of the myosin isoenzymes towards myosin V3 (18% V1, 27% V2, 55% V3) relative to normotensive Wistar rats (49% V1, 29% V2, 22% V3). A swimming routine with Wistar rats resulted in a shift towards myosin V1 (72% V1, 18% V2, 10% V3). The training effect is not restricted to normotensive rats, since spontaneously hypertensive rats subjected to the same swimming routine exhibited a myosin isoenzyme pattern (38% V1, 31% V2, 31% V3) approaching that of the sedentary Wistar rats. Swimming training can, therefore, prevent the myosin isoenzyme redistribution towards myosin V3 found in sedentary spontaneously hypertensive rats. Furthermore, systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced (130 +/- 8 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.322 Pa) ) in the swim-trained compared with the sedentary spontaneously hypertensive rats (157 +/- 12 mmHg). The training-induced changes in myosin polymorphism and systolic blood pressure are, at least partially, attributed to substantially normalized sympathetic activity. The functional relevance of swimming training in the spontaneously hypertensive rat is seen in the increased potential of coping with situations requiring fast contraction which may occur during sudden physical exertion or emotional stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rupp et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: