Why the study?
Does arrival by emergency medical services (EMS) improve mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does arrival by emergency medical services (EMS) improve mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
EMS is underutilized (25%) among ACS patients in the Arabian Gulf region, with no significant difference in adjusted mortality between EMS and non-EMS users, highlighting a need for integrated STEMI networks.
Similar adjusted mortality with EMS arrival in ACS; leaves open whether regional STEMI networks improve outcomes.
Data are scarce regarding emergency medical service (EMS) usage by patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Arabian Gulf region. This 9-month in-hospital prospective ACS registry was conducted in Arabian Gulf countries, with 30-day and 1-year follow-up mortality rates. Of 5184 patients with ACS, 1293 (25%) arrived at the hospital by EMS. The EMS group (vs non-EMS) was more likely to be male, have cardiac arrest on presentation, be current or exsmokers, and have moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The EMS group had higher crude mortality rates during hospitalization and after hospital discharge but not after adjustment for clinical factors and treatments. The EMSs are underused in the Arabian Gulf region. Short- and long-term mortality rates in patients with ACS are similar between those who used and did not use EMS. Quality improvement in the EMS infrastructure and establishment of integrated STEMI networks are urgently needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlHabib et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: